Unicom
March 2003 Issue
Defining Alternates
Many pilots miss the boat on applying alternate minimums when flight planning
The article “Alternate Realities” [Airmanship, January] left out probably the most important and least understood criteria for alternate airport selection. Mr. Veillette starts out talking about the ceiling and visibility requirement of 600 and 2 for precision approach and 800 and 2 for non-precision approach equipped airports, and goes on to say that there is more to it than that. Unfortunately, he then goes on to only explain half of the remaining equation – the most important and most overlooked part.
In the author’s explanation he is referring to the government charts, not Jeppesen. The government charts use the “A” in the triangle to define IFR Alternate Minimums. First, you must c...
To continue reading this entire article you must be a paid subscriber.
Subscribe to Aviation Safety
The monthly journal of risk management and accident prevention, is packed with useful, timely information on basic and advanced technique, accident analysis and, most important, practical articles on how you can develop the judgment that will keep you in the air and out of the NTSB's files.
Already subscribe but haven't registered for all the benefits of the website? Click here.
Subscriber Log In
Forgot your password? Click Here.
