Failed Training

Whats the point of good stick and rudder skills if you make decisions that will lead to grief?


You know how to fly. There may be no question about that. But that doesnt mean youre a safe pilot.

So many things influence the safety of a flight. Weather. Airplane. Pilot. Maintenance. Luck. The goal – no surprises here – is to stack as many things in your favor as possible. Its a lot more than that, though. Its also important to recognize the circumstances under which you might tend to ignore danger signals.

The biggest failure of general aviation flight training – from initial on – is the lack of emphasis on decision making and risk management. The FAAs Aeronautical Decision Making model is a feeble effort that focuses on rote memorization of bureaucratese. Clearly the answer is a real-world approach that helps pilots learn where dangers lie and how threatening situations can overwhelm even a prepared, proficient pilot.

King Schools has released an excellent course, Practical Risk Management for Pilots, on CD-ROM. Through scenario-based training, the Kings create an excellent set of illustrations that outline just where threats to your safety can pop up.

The Kings have long held that risk management is a neglected aspect of flight training, and many other training experts agree. Primary among their contentions is that external pressures have far more influence over a pilots willingness to embark on a risky course of action than most are willing to admit.

Yet external pressures are given only passing emphasis in most conventional flight training programs. Theyre consigned to brief discussions of get-home-itis and possibly a reference to VFR into IMC. In what appears to be an astounding lack of foresight, even the FAAs commercial certificate practical standards contain little on decision-making and risk-analysis skills – this for a license to fly for hire.

In the interest of safety, its important for pilots to hold themselves to a higher standard than the legal minimum. Most pilots admit this when it comes to instrument proficiency, yet seem to think its perfectly OK to ignore those aspects of training the government has refused to mandate.

In our book, there are three things every pilot should do at least once. The first is spin training. The second is semi-annual instrument proficiency checks for anyone who flies infrequent IFR. The third is to study and understand risk management in all of its forms.

Meeting the legal minimums for any task, rating or proficiency is like getting a C in flying. You dont accept that on your childrens report cards and you shouldnt accept that in your logbook.

Ive flown with pilots who showed superb stick and rudder skills but decision-making skills that would make Robert Downey Jr. cringe. Unfortunately, current flight training strategies churn them out like license plates.

Do yourself a favor. Demand more of yourself than a C.

-Ken Ibold


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here