No Answers

FAA cant measure the success of its efforts on safety without a reliable measure of flying


Like most pilots, I wish I had a nickel for each time Ive been asked the question, Is flying safe? And its a little irritating to have only a couple of responses to offer.

Option 1: It depends. Yeah, that sounds wishy-washy enough. Put yourself in your passengers brain for a second. If this guy cant answer a simple question like that, why in the world should I think hes got the smarts to pilot this airplane?

Option 2: Of course it is. Its my butt up there too, you know, and I wouldnt do it if it wasnt safe. OK, now the pilot sounds delusional. There are always reports of airplanes crashing. Theres fire and death and destruction. Safe my eye.

Option 3: About as safe as riding a motorcycle. Oh great, the pilot is either one of those kamikaze urban bikers who do wheelies away from stoplights or else hes a Hells Angels wannabe. Pass, thank you.

Clearly none of these are acceptable to pilots who want to justify both their passion for flying and their common sense for accepting the risk involved. But the simple matter is that theres no answer to that question.

But there could be. The FAA bureaucrats who seem to want to micromanage the lives of pilots almost down to boxers or briefs have neglected to provide the ammunition to answer the very questions about safety they presume to ask.

This is a little like asking Brett Favre to throw pass after pass yet never allowing him to see if the last one was complete.

Look at any of the statistics presuming to assess the safety of airplanes – ours included – and you will (or should) see a disclaimer that youre getting ballpark figures because no one has yet figured out how to put a good number on the exposure pilots have to the various risks. So we guess.

The FAA distributes surveys to a sample of pilots occasionally that ask how much the pilots fly. Those responses are extrapolated to the pilot population as a whole. The trouble is, people dont generally know, so they guess. And they usually guess high.

Ask your AME about the number of hours reported on medical applications. Some guys report 100 per year five biennia in a row, but their logbooks show 600 hours. Ask your mechanic how many owner-flown airplanes that come in for annual inspections havent racked up enough hours in the last year to need an oil change.

Its time for the FAA to start keeping track of airplane usage. Have mechanics file the number of hours flown in the last 12 months after every annual inspection. Tabulate the results by model and type. Make it freely available to the public. Then we can start to get answers that make sense.

In the past weve been hesitant to encourage more FAA bureaucracy, but the bureaucracy is driven by the perception of safety, and right now that perception is less certain than an al-Qaeda confession.

-Ken Ibold


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here